
The Shack: Where Tragedy Confronts Eternity (Windblown Media, 2008), by William Paul Young, is a book many Christians are talking about right now. It has sold around 10 million copies. Many of its readers love it, and many others hate it. The book has its failures, but not for the reasons most people think.
In the novel Mackenzie (Mack) Phillips wrestles with God over the abduction, rape, and murder of his youngest daughter, Missy. Following Missy’s death, Mack, who has always had a somewhat strained relationship with God, falls into what he calls “the Great Sadness.” One winter day Mack receives a letter from “Papa” (his wife’s favorite name for God) asking him to meet God in the shack where Missy’s bloody dress, the only evidence of her murder, was recovered. The rest of the book is a conversation between Mack and the three persons of the Trinity, each of whom appears in some human form.
The Theology
As popular as The Shack is, it is wildly controversial, mostly because people who think about theology often don’t know how to read fiction. The greatest controversy is over Young’s portrayal of God the Father as a woman (though she’s called “Papa”). God created mankind male and female “in his image” (Genesis 1:27). God is not a man, but neither is he neutral. He inspired the biblical writers to refer to him in the masculine (“he” and “him”), but he sometimes uses feminine imagery of maternal protection to describe himself in the Bible (see Deuteronomy 32:11; Psalm 17:8; Matthew 23:37). I believe we are meant to refer to God as “he” and “him” and “Father,” but I also believe he possesses the feminine qualities he gave to Eve and that there is a biblical precedent for speaking of God using feminine metaphors. Consider the parable of the woman who loses one of 10 coins and sweeps the whole house until she finds it again: in the parable, the woman is symbolic of God just as the coin symbolizes a lost soul (Luke 15:8-10). If Jesus used a feminine metaphor to teach something about God, Young can too. It doesn’t mean he believes God should be neutered and called our “Parent” in Heaven.
More important than the controversies in Young’s theology is what he does well. Young makes Christianity appear as good news to contemporary readers. For that reason, it’s my opinion that his good theology outweighs his mistakes.
The Craft
Unfortunately, when it comes to how well it is written, The Shack is wildly uneven. There were moments when I loved the book and moments when I couldn’t believe how poor the writing was. Three chapters in the book show real brilliance—they utterly captivate the audience and, in those moments, the book lives up to its reputation. The kidnapping, the meeting with Sophia, and the “God’s Eyes” chapters are excellent. The last of these, where Mack is able to see human souls the way God sees them, is so powerful it almost makes up for the book’s shortcomings.
Unfortunately, other moments in plot, character development, and language use are just plain bad. For example, Young describes a bump on Mack’s head, saying, “a significant lump had already formed, emerging like a humpbacked whale breaching the wild waves of his thinning hair.” Numerous topics covered in this encyclopedic look at Christianity simply didn’t belong in The Shack—the book’s plot and character development were at odds with Young’s purpose in this instance. He tried to cover too much, which resulted in preachy sermonettes that didn’t fit. Several chapters (including the foreward) should have been dropped.
Why Critique It This Way?
Anyone who has read The Shack might be wondering why I’m acting like a literary critic here, talking about the quality of the book’s writing. My answer: it’s a novel that has theology in it, not a book of theology. Novels, poems, songs, and movies have to be judged by more than their content. How many Christian films have you laughed at for being poorly made? On the other hand, Handel’s Messiah is so wonderful because its music is as powerful as its message (perhaps even more so). Until craft becomes as important to Christians as content, our art will not impact the world.
Literature (and other art forms) ought to be about engaging people’s imaginations to see a greater vision of truth. If unevenly, Young nevertheless achieves this and many Christians will benefit from reading his book; however, it is not a “great” novel and its flaws are big enough that the book’s popularity might be only a passing fad. If Young had given the book to some real literary critics or novelists to read beforehand, they might have helped him create a book that will endure. As it is, I fear it will not. |L
Dr. Charlie Starr teaches English, Humanities, and Film at Kentucky Christian University in Grayson, Kentucky.
OTHER COLUMNS:
November 8, 2009 - Why I believe in God
October 25, 2009 - Commuting in days of evil
October 11, 2009 - Poets and don’t know it
September 27, 2009 - How Hollywood proves abortion is wrong
September 13, 2009 - Significance
August 30, 2009 - Dance alternatives
August 16, 2009 - Gluttons for gossip
August 2, 2009 - Truth from Twilight
July 19, 2009 - Visitor-friendly churches
June 21, 2009 - When forgiveness fails
June 7, 2009 - Re-imagining Education (Part Six)
May 24, 2009 - We are not alone
May 3, 2009 - Re-imagining education (part five)
April 26, 2009 - Conviction
April 12, 2009 - Re-imagining education (part four)
March 29, 2009 - An evangelistic proposal
March 15, 2009 - Re-imagining education (part three)
March 1, 2009 - He makes me sick
February 15, 2009 - Re-imagining education (Part Two)
February 1, 2009 - Spiritual insecurity
January 18, 2009 - Re-imagining education (part one)
January 4, 2009 - Church and politics
December 21, 2008 - Heaven’s music
December 7, 2008 - The church and marriage
November 23, 2008 - God and the president
November 9, 2008 - A time for courage
October 26, 2008 - Likes and dislikes: the Prince Caspian movie
October 12, 2008 - What’s that noise?
September 28, 2008 - Modesty matters (part two)
September 14, 2008 - All it takes is some TLC
August 31, 2008 - Modesty matters (part one)
August 17, 2008 - What would you fight for?
August 3, 2008 - Staying through the credits
July 20, 2008 - Honor to whom honor
July 6, 2008 - Tyler Perry and the movies you’re missing
June 22, 2008 - The peaceable kingdom
May 25, 2008 - Another generation grew up
May 25, 2008 - Technology and the Bible (part two)
May 11, 2008 - Technology and the Bible (part one)
April 27, 2008 - What is truth?
April 13, 2008 - And the geek shall inherit the earth
March 30, 2008 - A charactered God
March 16, 2008 - The college choice (part two)
March 2, 2008 - Good news can be hard to hear
February 17, 2008 - The college choice (part one)
February 5, 2008 - Ten suggestions for a godly standard of living
January 20, 2008 - Expelled: that “Bueller” guy’s pro-God movie
January 6, 2008 - Choosing a lifestyle
December 23, 2007 - Teachable TV?
December 9, 2007 - Owners or stewards?
November 25, 2007 - Christians teaching Christians to change TV and film
November 11, 2007 - My money is God’s business
October 28, 2007 - Navigating under the radar
October 14, 2007 - The things God values
September 30, 2007 - Movie moments
September 16, 2007 - God’s economics
September 2, 2007 - The best books to read
August 19, 2007 - There’s a rat in ‘separate’
August 5, 2007 - The art of reading
July 22, 2007 - Atheist chic
July 8, 2007 - Why books matter: the sequel
June 10, 2007 - Books: why they matter
June 3, 2007 - The non-impact of “The Lost Tomb of Jesus”
May 27, 2007 - The universal gospel
May 13, 2007 - Loving Muslims through culture
April 29, 2007 - Hope
April 15, 2007 - God in the dark
April 1, 2007 - The gospel goes to the movies
March 18, 2007 - What the Bible movies can teach us
March 4, 2007 - What will you hurt for?
February 18, 2007 - Why Heroes . . .
February 4, 2007 - Give peace a chance
January 21, 2007 - When fairy tales are true
January 7, 2007 - WYSIWYG lives
December 31, 2006 - What’s coming next?
December 17, 2006 - Mercy, mercy
December 3, 2006 - Proof of evolution!
November 19, 2006 - Hungering for God
November 5, 2006 - Violence and government, war and peace
October 22, 2006 - The mighty meek
October 8, 2006 - The Battlestar and the Bible
September 24, 2006 - Soap for the soul
September 10, 2006 - Right vs. cool
August 27, 2006 - The painful truth
August 13, 2006 - More Lies Hollywood Tells
July 30, 2006 - Christian counter culture
July 16, 2006 - The lies Hollywood tells June 16, 2006
July 2, 2006 - Roll over, Da Vinci July 2, 2006
June 18, 2006 - Blockbuster season June 18, 2006
June 4, 2006 - All things to all men June 4, 2006
May 21, 2006 - When media attacks! May 21, 2006
May 7, 2006 - Culture critiques church May 7, 2006
April 23, 2006 - Responding to The Da Vinci Code April 23, 2006
April 9, 2006 - The Matrix (but not the movie) April 9, 2006
March 26, 2006 - The inside scoop Mar. 26, 2006
March 12, 2006 - Teach your children Mar. 12, 2006
February 26, 2006 - Lessons from the Lost
February 12, 2006 - Syncretism, shmyncretism Feb. 12, 2006
January 29, 2006 - Holy Hollywood?
January 15, 2006 - A people under the Word
January 1, 2006 - Lessons from Kong